RSS Readers

Student Bloggers

 

Entries in Opinion (23)

Monday
Apr182011

Leading Through Action (or, Not Everything is for Your Resume)

Leadership is more than standing at a podium. Image courtesy of Flickr user Young Fabians. Licensed under CC BY NC SA 2.0.

I’ve been thinking a lot about the idea of campus leadership. It’s the sort of phrase that my school likes to print on admissions brochures as a way to distract people from our lack of a football team. We even offer a leadership certificate (it is as ridiculous as you would imagine), and there are awards for leaders, and we talk a lot about how the liberal arts Train People to Lead.

The longer I’m at school, though, the more that it’s becoming irritatingly clear to me that there is a difference between being a campus leader--getting certificates and learning the psychology of leadership and racking up the most volunteer hours--and actually leading people on campus in creating something. The idea of hacking college, for me, has always been about the latter far more than the former. Talking to my friends at school, it’s become more and more clear that I’m not the only one who feels like this.

Being a campus leader is exclusive--there are only so many club spots to fill or awards to earn. Leading on campus is inclusive--literally anyone can make something neat, whether it’s a website about how to hide your beer cans, or an app that helps students, or a video that Ashton Kutcher tweeted about. Anyone who works and who has an idea can do something useful and interesting--you can have an entire campus of leaders because the world is full of things that need to be fixed and the world is so, so much bigger than just your campus.

Read more...

Click to read more ...

Thursday
Feb102011

A Few Tips For Dating a Nerd

I think we all do.In honor of Valentine's Day, I thought it would be appropriate to share this old post I wrote awhile ago for our friends at College Candy. It's written for a female audience, but the tips are pretty applicable to girl nerds and guy nerds alike. Enjoy!

If you haven’t dated a nerd yet in college, you should really give it a spin. We’re generally intelligent, motivated to treat you like a princess, and can fix your computer to boot. That said, we do have our fair share of surprising quirks that you should be prepared for. As a happy boyfriend of one year and editor of a blog that supports digitizing textbooks and carrying around portable computer monitors, I feel uniquely qualified to offer up a few tips to break in your new favorite nerd.

1. Try to understand when he whips it out in public.

His laptop, I mean. Or smartphone, if you’re lucky. Either way, most nerds I’ve come across share the common physiological need to access the answer to any lingering question, at all times. Deciding what to get for dinner, and don’t know what bulgogi is? Before you even lift your eyes from the menu your boyfriend will probably have his internet-connected device of choice out on the table to look it up for you. While I’m inclined to say that this behavior enhances conversation by providing valuable information, I realize that many would disagree. If the gadgets coming out a little too often, don’t be afraid to lay down the law and declare an internet-free zone.

 

Click to read more ...

Thursday
Feb032011

No, Hacking College Does Not Mean Blowing off Learning

Hacking your way through college does not mean you'll miss out on your education. In fact, you may learn even more. Image courtesy of Flickr user Nazareth College and licensed under CC by 2.0.

Readers of this site get their projects done faster, don't worry about losing work from an unsaved paper, and love to make their class notes searchable and organized.  Yes, the advantages of embracing the life hacking culture as a student are numerous. However, whenever I've tried to describe the concept to others, I'm often greeted by a common refrain.

"Doesn't taking shortcuts through college mean you'll miss out on learning?"

This perception is woefully outdated and off-base, and you should never be discouraged if you hear it yourself, because here's the dirty secret: learning is not college, and college is not learning. 

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Jan202009

Free Alternatives to Office and iWork

Image Courtesy: CNET News BlogThe Web 2.0 era has changed the internet so much. The browser has become some many different things. Some of the things they can do now, is create documents, spreadsheets and even presentations all on the web. Where could one do such a thing? Well, as long as you have a Google account, you are free to use the Documents application.

Google Docs doesn't require a download. No worries though, with Google Gears you can edit project just like a desktop application when you don't have a connection.

One of the reasons I like free online productivity suites like Google Docs is it allows students to collaborate remotely. Apple is trying to do this with "iWork.com" but they plan on charging for it eventually. Also, because of Google's popularity, it'll be easy for you to find people that have Google accounts.

Some people could make the argument that giving Google permission to handle your documents and other infomation might be giving away too much. If you feel that way, another free online productivity suite is Zoho. If you don't want to give your info to a big corporation like Google, then Zoho is a perfect alternative. It still gives you the collaboration abilities Docs, but you might be hardpressed to find people with Zoho accounts because the site is not widely know in the college community.

I do have a disclamer though. While Docs and Zoho are quality web applications, it does lack a little bit of the sophistication that gets put into applications like Office and iWork. Going along those lines, if you do want a program you can download, I suggest going to Open Office or Lotus Symphony to get productivity on the freeness.  Beware, this will take up a substantial amount of space on your hard drive. Open Office is 167 MB Lotus (which was developed by IBM) is 195 MB.

In closing, the best part about Google Docs is IT'S FREE. So, for prospective college students, I implore you to not buy Office or iWork when purchasing a computer for school. If you are skeptical, try Docs out for your next paper. I'm sure you'll be pleased. For college students, again, it's a great way to collaborate or if you are out of luck as far as program access codes go, give this a shot.

Questions or comments about this article? Email me at mike@hackcollege.com or comment below.

 

Wednesday
Jan142009

College Admissions Hell

While HackCollege has an audience of (surprise!) college students, there are many readers of the site that are soon-to-be college students. Those students are probably just finishing up college admissions packets.

We haven't written much on college admissions much on the site, but it's definitely a significant part of the college process for those in and trying to get in to the school. Current students should be (slightly) concerned with the caliber of students admitted to their own school.

So today we're linking out to an article I found called the Dirty Secrets of College Admissions. It's definitely a good read.

For those that will be applying to college next year, try outsourcing your college applications (a la the 4-Hour Work Week). Let's face it, you've got better things to do with your time than fill out the same application a dozen times.

Friday
Aug152008

Forbes Releases Its Own College Rankings

Before applying to college, many students will look through U.S. News & World Report's America's Best Colleges. The higher the ranking, the higher the prestige. And hopefully, higher the starting salary.

And who wouldn't want to attend a high-ranked college or university? From graduation on, that school's name will stick to your resume. And if there is anything you can do to improve your school's ranking, you should. It would essentially improve your credentials as well.

So today is a good day.

Forbes has released its take on the college ranking system, basing 25% of the rankings on 7 million student evaluations of courses and instructors, as recorded on the Web site RateMyProfessors.com.

Let me repeat. Based on what you and your peers wrote on the infamous RateMyProfessors.

So maybe instead of bashing that professor for a low B, you should commend them for the greatest semester of your life. That is, if anyone actually reads Forbes.

[Forbes' Top 50 U.S. Colleges, via AboveTheLaw & Althouse]

A quick "top 10" comparison between the two rankings after the jump.


Forbes' Top 10:
1. Princeton
2. California Institute of Technology
3. Harvard
4. Swarthmore
5. Williams
6. U.S. Military Academy
7. Amherst
8. Wellesley
9. Yale
10. Columbia

U.S. News & World Report's Top 10:
1. Princeton University (NJ)
2. Harvard University (MA)
3. Yale University(CT)
4. Stanford University(CA)
5. University of Pennsylvania
5. California Institute of Technology
7. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
8. Duke University(NC)
9. Columbia University(NY)
9. University of Chicago

Wednesday
Apr092008

Technology in College -- For its own sake

This was an article originally written for the Los Angeles Loyolan, the student-run newspaper at LMU. We thought most HackCollege readers would also find it interesting.

I’m part of the last generation of “Film Production” majors to go through LMU. The School of Film and Television is phasing out the major and already, the sophomores and freshmen major in something different: just plain old “Production.” The point is to encompass both television and film (and maybe even new media) into one major. The class structure is altered now so that students have to take both television and film classes. The idea is that the two workflows are gradually converging, as one-hour television dramas shoot on film and action movies get shot on digital video. That sounds pretty progressive for a film school, doesn’t it?

 

 

Unfortunately, changing the name of a major doesn’t do the trick. If you’re going to shoot a junior thesis, AKA PROD 300, you have to use film – actual film, like the stuff we used in still cameras once upon a time. Real film is expensive. That means the bare minimum budget for a junior thesis is about $3,000. Indeed, it’s as goofy a requirement as it sounds. Effectively, when you’re a junior, you can’t shoot a fictional piece on a digital medium in spite of the dawn of iTunes, high-definition television and outstanding digital cameras like the Red One. Granted, 35mm is certainly not obsolete, but it’s noncore for a media person these days.

Our school is chock full of such techno-hypocrisy. Tenured professors who still use AOL meet in 2008 with young people holding iPhones. These bigwigs sit on boards and control policies to prepare students for real life – if our students were graduating 10 years ago. Someone out there saw this happening at LMU and decided to do something about it: hence, the ITA. Every school at Loyola has an Instructional Technology Analyst, whose sole job is to push people toward podcasting and blogging. The ITAs report to IT – not the deans and Jesuits from the past – which gives them enough autonomy to make changes quickly. It’s a step in the right direction, which I applaud, but I still have to watch my peers struggle with celluloid just to meet the requirements for graduation.

Why do people need to learn digital video instead of film? It seems silly to ask this question, but it sheds light on other situations. If the industry is moving towards cameras with hard drives instead of clockwork, then shouldn’t our students be learning about those instead? By the same token, if PR is moving towards MySpace and lectures are moving towards iTunes U then shouldn’t the same follow for our communications and education majors?

In the technology biz, people are critical of one such new phenomenon: the wiki. A wiki is a simple online space for organizing and sharing information. There are other wikis besides Wikipedia – ones for traveling, planning weddings or Philosophy 101 classes. Few would argue that there’s anything inherently bad about a wiki. The resentment is for the “throw a wiki at it” mentality that many leaders trumpet – where letting users put all the information in one place can supposedly solve every problem. Wikis can’t solve every problem and neither can digital video, blogs or Blackboard. One might say: “But isn’t that what these ITAs are doing? Just promoting technology for the sake of it?”

They are, but in the classroom, it’s different. I never thought I’d be doing this, but this is an argument for “technology for the sake of technology.” I really think that educational institutions are an exception to the “throw a Wiki at it” misconception, because throwing a Wiki means a class of students has to learn how to catch one. Students need to know these technologies so that they can use them when they graduate. In other words -- if we still wrote our papers on typewriters none of us would get jobs.

Sunday
Jan272008

Outside HackCollege: A Students' Reaction to the MPAA

From time to time, I write for Portfolio.com's tech section as a junior correspondent of sorts. My most recent post, published today, is a reaction to the MPAA overestimating the effect of student piracy and the rest of the web media--in turn--hastily criticizing the MPAA. The point of my quick post is that people are looking at the wrong parts of the argument. Check it out:

"We're Not Thieves Just Cash Poor Consumers" [Portfolio.com]